JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 7, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Lino Diaz Ruiz Vs. Juzgado Quince Civil Municipal De Bucaramanga

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Noveno Civil Del Circuito De Bucaramanga Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Santander, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Noveno Civil Del Circuito De Bucaramanga
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento de la acción de tutela cuando autoridades judiciales carecen de superior jerárquico común
Accion De Tutela Contra Juzgado Civil Municipal
  • Competencia de jueces del circuito
Juez De Tutela
  • Vinculación de otras entidades para la efectiva protección de derechos fundamentales una vez asumido el conocimiento
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. ORDENAR que por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, se REMITA al Juzgado
  2. Noveno. Civil del Circuito de Bucaramanga, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Lino Diaz Ruiz contra el Juzgado Quince Civil Municipal de Bucaramanga para que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento del mismo.
  3. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Santander, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, lo resuelto en esta providencia con el fin de ponerle en conocimiento los fundamentos constitucionales y legales en virtud de los cuales se adopta la presente decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.